All of them, those in power, and those who want the power, would pamper us, if we agreed to overlook their crookedness by wilfully restricting our activities.
Disclaimer: Dianetics and Scientology are trademarks of the Religious Technology Center (RTC.) These pages and their author are not connected with the Church of Scientology or RTC, or any other organization residing under their corporate umbrella.
This site is best viewed using a highly standards-compliant browser
(1997): "Scientology's Secret Service"
Uniquely for a "religion", the
Church of Scientology has since 1955 organised systematic
intelligence activities, including on occasions bugging,
burglary, forgery, framing, infiltration and intimidation.
Such activities are conducted alongside and in support
of a sophisticated PR machine which specialises in producing
distasteful personal attacks on those perceived as being
opponents of Scientology.
These activities have been run through three agencies within the Church of Scientology: the Hubbard Communications Office, or HCO (from 1955-66); the Guardian Office or GO (1966-83), and its successor, the Office of Special Affairs or OSA (1983 to present). These pages expose aspects of all three organisations, the dirty tricks which have been carried out at the behest of Scientology's leaders and the philosophy which lies behind Scientology's extreme sensitivity to criticism.
This makes it all the more important that when drug
abusers are treated for their addiction, the treatment
should be effective. Treatment costs money, and money
- whether it comes from the public purse or private
pockets - is often scarce. Ineffective treatment is
thus not only useless, it is worse than useless; money
spent on useless treatments is money taken away from
more effective treatments. This means that any drug
rehabilitation therapy must address two questions:
Does it work? Can it work?
In Narconon's case, there is strong evidence that the answer to both questions is "no". Critiquing Narconon is therefore not simply about "bashing" a worthy group; it is vital if drug addicts are to get the treatment they so desperately need, rather than wasting time and money on ineffective pseudoscientific "therapies". If there was no doubt about Narconon, such a critique would not be needed - but there is doubt, and it is only right that such doubts should receive a fair hearing. Unsurprisingly, Narconon itself chooses not to mention facts or views which contradict its own statements; this website aims to fill that gap.
The rosy picture of Hubbard's heroic wartime service
ultimately was shattered in the US courts.
Gerry Armstrong had by this time
been declared a "Suppressive Person" and was expelled
from Scientology for his insistence that Hubbard's life
story had been grossly misrepresented over the years.
He took with him a large number of highly sensitive
documents, including material from Hubbard's Navy and
Veterans' Administration files. He was subsequently
taken to court by Scientology in a case that came to
trial in May 1984. A keystone of Armstrong's defence
was his contention that he was right about the incorrectness
Hubbard's of publicised life story. In defence, Scientology
put Hubbard's sometime second-in-command, former Lt.
Thomas Moulton, in the witness stand to testify on Hubbard's
war years. The subsequent cross-examination proved devastating
for the Church of Scientology, which lost the case.
(2000): "The Control Agenda: Control, Responsibility and Freedom in the Church of Scientology"
Although the interlinked, fractal nature of the "control
agenda" can fairly readily be seen in today's Scientology,
it has in fact developed in a very piecemeal fashion
over about 30 years. It did not develop to any pre-determined
plan and, due to Hubbard's insistence that nobody but
he was allowed to amend Scientology doctrine, it has
never been revised to resolve the numerous inconsistencies
which crept in over the years. This is the root cause
of the many contradictions which commentators have noted
over the years. To make sense of those contradictions,
it is necessary to examine how each thread of the control
agenda developed and ultimately merged.
(2000): "Scientology vs. Psychiatry: The origins of Scientology's hostility to psychiatry"
Hubbard himself involved psychiatrists in the development
of Dianetics, right from the earliest days. The science
fiction editor
John W. Campbell in 1949 wrote to Dr. Winter informing
him of Hubbard's researches: "With cooperation from
some institutions, some psychiatrists, he [Hubbard]
has worked on all types of cases." When Hubbard's first
article on Dianetics was completed it was initially
offered for publication to the Journal of the American
Medical Association and the American Journal of Psychiatry.
Both rejected it on the ground of insufficient clinical
evidence of the technique's effectiveness.
(1998): "Scientology's secret war against psychiatry"
Hubbard is here saying that Scientology's core goal
is no longer the spread of his "tech" but the complete
destruction of all other mental health practices. This
was not idle talk, as the GO made strenuous efforts
to attack psychiatrists — an effort which is still going
on, in the shape of Scientology's continued denunciations
of psychiatrists and psychiatric drugs such as Prozac.
There is certainly little doubt that Scientology's current
leaders share Hubbard's objective of the eradication
(extermination?) of psychiatry.
David Miscavige
has been reported to have pledged that psychiatry will
have been eliminated by the year 2000. No doubt this
promise will quietly be dropped when the millennium
comes around and psychiatry continues in rude good health.
|
Scientology Audited: An archive of independent research and documentation on Scientology
An archive of independent research and documentation
on Scientology
(1998): "The Corruption of Scientology" One of the most controversial aspects of
that controversial organisation, the Church of Scientology,
is its financial dealings. The Church's corporate structure
is fiendishly complicated, involving scores of entities in
dozens of countries, which are supposedly "each totally and
legally independent from one another, connected only by
ecclesiastical bonds" 1 . The complexity of the structure
failed to deter the US Internal Revenue Service from
investigating Scientology's financial dealings following the
Church's exemption from taxes in 1957. The exemption was
revoked in 1967, leading to a 26-year legal battle which was
resolved in somewhat peculiar circumstances in 1993, with
exemption restored to Scientology and its associated
entities. What had the IRS discovered and why did they mount
against Scientology what insiders claim to have been the
biggest investigation in its history? The answer was simple:
Scientology had operated corruptly and fraudulently for
years under the cover of a respectable tax-exempt religious
institution. 2
The story of Scientology's corruption by its leaders is an extraordinary and unedifying one, but the story really begins many years before Scientology's foundation in 1952. It begins, as does all else in Scientology, with that extraordinary and perplexing man, L. Ron Hubbard. [...] (1998): "Scientology versus the I.R.S."
On 1 October 1993, the Church of Scientology obtained
tax exemption from the United States Internal Revenue
Service (IRS). This ended 26 years of what the Church
itself has described as a "war" against the IRS, in
which it used extraordinary and in many cases illegal
tactics - bugging of government offices, theft of mountains
of classified files, private detectives pursuing senior
government officials, thousands of lawsuits, full-page
attack adverts in US daily newspapers, and so on.
So perhaps it is not such a great surprise that the settlement itself came about in some very unusual circumstances, raising questions about the actions of both the Church of Scientology and the IRS. Neither party has been willing to provide answers, with the IRS refusing to disclose the terms of the exemption agreement in defiance of a court order and US taxation law. But with the leak in December 1997 of the secret agreement, the relationship between Scientology and the IRS is under greater scrutiny now than ever before. (1997): "Hysterical Radiation and Bogus Science"
Unfortunately, the scientific veracity of Scientology
falls apart under even modest scrutiny. Most noteworthy
are Hubbard's views on atomic radiation, which betray
what an eminent Australian radiologist described as
"complete and utter ignorance of physics, nuclear science
and medicine"
(1997): "Scientology's fight for apartheid: The secret history of racism in Scientology"
The evidence is clear and unambiguous: a variety of
books, periodicals and papers from inside and outside
Scientology, produced over the last 40 years, details
how the Church of Scientology actively supported the
forces and philosophy of apartheid for many years. I
have made use of these materials to chronicle what I
have termed "Scientology's fight for apartheid". To
say the least, it shows Scientology to have behaved
in a way which totally belies its stated goals...
(2000): "Hubbard's research methods revealed"
One particularly curious point is that his original
research notes have never been published. They probably
show him to be a complete fruitcake, if a fascinating
lecture entitled "Electromagnetic Scouting: Battle
of the Universes" (April 1952, exact date unknown)
is anything to go by. Back in 1952, this lecture was
just another part of Scientology — there wasn't anything
secret or, for that matter, sacred about it (this was
in the days when it was explicitly stated that it was
a science, not a religion). It wasn't until the start
of the 1960s that such material began to be designated
"confidential" as part of the OT courses. Access to
this particular tape is highly restricted these days,
so presumably it forms part of the OT materials.
(1997): "Documents of a Lifetime: The L. Ron Hubbard Papers"
The life of L. Ron Hubbard (1911-1986) was surely one
of the most extraordinary which this century has seen.
He already has an entire Web site devoted to him, at
the handsomely-produced
http://www.lronhubbard.org.
The account of his life given there is, however, a rather
limited one - perhaps not surprisingly, given that the
site belongs to Hubbard's brainchild, the
Church of Scientology.
This site contains copies of a number of publicly-available
documents about Hubbard. The items listed below all
come from public sources in the US. Most were obtained
through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA); some
come from the still-sealed exhibits of the 1984 case
Church of Scientology of California vs Gerald Armstrong
(but were obtained legally, both here in Europe and
in the US). They present a rather
different picture of Hubbard, showing him to have a
much darker side than is officially admitted by Scientology.
(2000): "The Brainwashing Manual - the hard facts"
Hubbard publicised the booklet in late 1955 as the first
stage in a 40-year
war against psychiatry
which the Church of Scientology continues today. Hubbard
had been convinced for some years that communists and
psychiatrists were separately conspiring against him
to do him and Dianetics/Scientology down and sent a
lengthy series of
letters to the FBI denouncing various of his associates,
including his wife, as communist agents provocateur.
In August 1955 a Scientologist named Edd Cark was arrested
in Phoenix, AZ for
practising medicine
without a license (perhaps as a result of a complaint
from local medical authorities). Hubbard was livid and
for the first time denounced psychiatrists as working
for communist — specifically Soviet — interests.
|