The Helena Kobrin Love Page


Grady Ward once again tells Helena where to go


Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology,comp.org.eff.talk,alt.censorship
From: grady@netcom.com (Grady Ward)
Subject: The 'ho of babble-on RETURNS
Message-ID: 
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 04:13:58 GMT
Sender: grady@netcom13.netcom.com

>From hkk Mon Mar 11 19:03:07 1996
Return-Path: 
Received: by netcom21.netcom.com (8.6.13/Netcom)
        id SAA29325; Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:58:24 -0800
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 1996 18:58:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Helena Kobrin 
Subject: Re: Your Violation of Intellectual Property Rights
To: grady@netcom.com
Message-ID: 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                   March 11, 1996
 
                              VIA E-MAIL AND CERTIFIED U.S. MAIL
 
 
 
Mr. Grady Ward
3449 Martha Court
Arcata, CA 95521
 
Re: Your Violation of Intellectual Property Rights
 
Dear Mr. Ward:
 
     I obviously do not need any introduction, as you know who I
am.  I have seen your posting to alt.religion.scientology,
soliciting copies of a NOTs pack to be sent to your house.
 
     I am writing to put you formally on notice that the contents
of the NOTs pack is copyrighted, confidential, unpublished
materials, owned by my client, Religious Technology Center, which
constitute trade secrets under the California Uniform Trade
Secrets Act (UTSA), as ruled in Bridge Publications, Inc. v.
Vien, 827 F.Supp. 629, 633 (S.D.Cal. 1993).  That pack has only
left the premises of an advanced Church of Scientology through
theft.  All copies of that pack have been ordered impounded by
courts in the United States and Europe.  Therefore, any copies
which still exist in unauthorized hands are the fruit of that
theft and have been made and distributed in violation of court
orders.
 
     You are mistaken in your apparent notion that not having
signed a confidentiality agreement insulates you from liability
for trade secret misappropriation.  Under the UTSA and case law
interpreting that Act, misappropriation includes acquiring a
trade secret of another with knowledge of the confidential and
misappropriated status of the trade secret, or from or through a
person having a duty to the owner of the trade secret.  It also
includes innocent acquisition--which yours could not possibly be-
-if notice is received afterwards.  You have clearly been on
notice both before and after any such acquisition of these
materials.
 
     You are hereby again put on notice that your *acquisition*
of any copies of the NOTs pack is a trade secret
misappropriation.  Additional acts taken by you may well also
constitute copyright infringement of these materials.
 
     Your derogatory remarks concerning me and my clients are
uncalled for and libelous.  They do not change the fact that you
are violating the law.  Any further attempts to violate the law
will result in appropriate action.  If you fail to heed this
warning, you act at your own peril.
 
                              Very truly yours,
                              Helena K. Kobrin
 


I presume my anonymous correspondents obtain their documents legally.
Relying upon advice form a *proven* liar like yourself would be
not prudent, eh?

When your don't have your hands -- er mouth -- full from oral advice
to criminal perpetrator Eugene Martin Ingram, please tell the
Napoleon of Nutz Miscavige that he and Rinder can't do a damn thing
about this wog in Power.  

You Helena Kobrin are destined to end up in Eugene's stable when you
fail yet again to be at cause over a.r.s.  We all fervently hope that
as you beg Ingram not to treat you like his other "service providers"
that you will regret your life as a 'ho for a criminal cult.