My followup to Lurkmonster
From: wulfen@NOSPAMtotal.net (Wulfen - www.total.net/~wulfen/scn/)
Subject: Re: Hagglund, Stop avoiding my question
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 03:26:19 GMT
Organization: ARSCC Toronto
References: <3814EED1.D4A690C3@home.com> <email@example.com> <kBkVOOmtSD1hr8YSJEmEfY4Zgf95@4ax.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.11/32.235
X-Trace: 25 Oct 1999 23:28:32 -0500, 18.104.22.168
Path: news2.lightlink.com! 22.214.171.124
Xref: news2.lightlink.com alt.religion.scientology:1033739
On Mon, 25 Oct 1999 23:06:25 -0400, lurkmonster <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999 02:46:28 GMT, wulfen@NOSPAMtotal.net (Wulfen - www.total.net/~wulfen/scn/) wrote:
Check it out... Gregg must really be getting under the cult's protective layer of Body Thetans. This is a classic example of Scientology's dead agenting and loud investigation tactics. I shall translate and analyze, for the benefit of all the newbies...
Seems to me that the questions imply that Gregg is being secretly paid to picket and cause trouble for the Church of Scientology, instead of being an activity that he does because he believes in what he is doing.
Yah, definitely - this is a far more succinct analysis of the questions' implication than mine. I should have made this clearer. :-) However, I like to address the specific points in my own wordy manner.
Oh, and I'm pretty sure that he's not getting paid to picket - the pressure from the cult would long ago have driven away anyone but an ideologically motivated critic, in my opinion.
But if Gregg is getting paid, then certainly none of the money is filtering down to me. ;-)
Note how nice I am to leave your theta URLs in the message. :-)
-- Science is a method, not an ideology. --