Scientology Critical Information Directory
Home
About
Scientology practices and beliefs
Scientology critics
Scientology victims
Scientology library
Scientology finances
Scientology: various topics
Scientology glossary
A... B... C... D... E... F...
G... H... I... J... K... L...
M... N... O... P... Q... R...
S... T... U... V... W... X...
Go Back
In order for the character of a human being to reveal truly exceptional qualities, we must have the good fortune to observe its action over a long period of years. If this action is devoid of all selfishness, if the idea that directs it is one of unqualified generosity, if it is absolutely certain that it has not sought recompense anywhere, and if moreover it has left visible marks on the world, then we are unquestionably dealing with an unforgettable character.
—Jean Giono, "L'homme qui plantait des arbres"
Disclaimer: Dianetics and Scientology are trademarks of the Religious Technology Center (RTC.) These pages and their author are not connected with the Church of Scientology or RTC, or any other organization residing under their corporate umbrella.

Author examines new cults

By Doug Walker
5 January 1974
The Lethbridge Herald, p. 5
Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada


"Cults of Unreason" by Dr. Christopher Evans (Harrap, $11.25, 264 pages, distributed by Clarke, Irwin & Company Limited).

New that the University of Lethbridge has pioneered in the field of bestowing honorary degrees on people who venture beyond the accepted pale of academic thought there are all sorts of possibilities for nominations in the future. To the name of Immanuel Velikovsky can be added the names of people dealt with in this latest book by British experimental psychologist Dr. Christopher Evans.

Worthy of consideration are the following: L. Ron Hubbard, a brave pioneer in the exploration of the human mind, discoverer of Dianetics and founder of Scientology; Desmond Leslie and George Adamski, who collaborated in a work that shifted interest in Unidentified Flying Objects from quasi-serious science fiction into Ufology; George de la Warr, courageous investigator of radionics and inventor of a box for diagnostic purposes; Wilhelm Reich, discoverer of orgone and inventor of the Orgone Accumulator; George Ivanovich Gurdjieff, one of the first to bring the blessings of Eastern mysticism to the West.

There are those who will be offended by the suggestion that Velikovsky belongs to the company just mentioned.

Yet the fact that he is frequently confused today with Erich Von Daniken, purveyor of a lot of nonsense about extraterrestrial visitations, is indicative of how perilously close he stands to such dubious leaders of thought. And if Velikovsky's theory of planetary collisions is of secondary importance to his example of persistence in the face of ostracism by the academic world, as the basis for being granted an honorary degree, then his association with Wilhelm Reich ought not to be considered outrageous. Reich had even better credentials as a martyr, having died in prison after defying authority in loyalty to his convictions about the usefulness of his Orgone Accumulator.

Perhaps the clearest connection of Velikovsky with the cult groups is found in the way he and they employ the Bible and other ancient literature to support their cases. Evans mentions a Jewish theologian, claiming 15 years' study in theology, who held that "the Book of Moses is an accurate account of an encounter between a small group of people living in the Middle East and a race of space beings." He also mentions the interpretation of a vision by Ezekiel as a UFO sighting. That's not much worse than Velikovsky's fanciful use of the Old Testament. Then there is the assertion of Desmond Leslie that the first interplanetary vessel arrived on earth from Venus in the year 18,617,841 B.C. — a date calculated from the ancient Brahmin tables (the Brahmins were exceedingly accurate people, according to Leslie). Not surprisingly, Velikovsky doesn't mention that ancient source because he was intent on establishing that Venus didn't come into existence until 1500 B.C.

It is difficult not to succumb to sarcasm when dealing with cults of unreason. Christopher Evans succumbs but his sarcasm is not savage and will entertain all but the ardent believer. The fact is that Evans ends up being fairer (about Scientology, at least) than his reporting would lead the reader to expect. He even acknowledges that readers may be surprised "to find that after highlighting the absurdities, inconsistencies and smoky background of Scientology," he concludes without giving it a "wholehearted thumbs-down."

The purpose of the book—to enquire why cults gain a following—seems to me to be largely submerged in the enterprise of describing their history and essence. Some useful suggestions are made but they need to be developed at greater length because the repudiation of reason at this advanced stage of human development is surely of considerable interest and importance.

DOUG WALKER