All of them, those in power, and those who want the power, would pamper us, if we agreed to overlook their crookedness by wilfully restricting our activities.
Disclaimer: Dianetics and Scientology are trademarks of the Religious Technology Center (RTC.) These pages and their author are not connected with the Church of Scientology or RTC, or any other organization residing under their corporate umbrella.
This site is best viewed using a highly standards-compliant browser
Disclaimer: This archive is presented strictly in the public interest for research purposes. All the copyrights of materials reproduced here are the properties of their respective owners.
The head of the Baltimore office of the federal Food and Drug Administration has been visited by a group of ministers and parishioners from the Church of Scientology in connection with a U. S. District Court case being pressed by the FDA against the religious body.
The eight-year-old case, which is slated to go to court Monday, June 7, in Washington, stems from a raid on a Scientology church In the nation's capital in January, 1963, by a group of FDA-deputized Baltimore longshoreman.
The raiders seized a large quantity of Scientology literature and other materials, which the FDA is holding for eventual destruction if the courts permit.
The purpose of Tuesday's visit to Morris L. Strait of the Baltimore FDA office, according to a Scientology spokesman, was to "find out why the FDA is practicing religious persecution."
The church maintains that the FDA is trying to destroy Scientology, despite a 1969 decision by the U. S. Court of Appeals that the church Is "a bona fide religion."
The FDA claims that the church has given "false" and "misleading" information to the public, that it promises "healing" and that it promotes "drug abuse."
Scientology spokesman note that their church operates a drug rehabilitation program called "Narconon" and that it does not condone the use of drugs.
Some legal authorities see the case between the FDA and the church as having widespread Implications for the concept of religious freedom guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution.