All of them, those in power, and those who want the power, would pamper us, if we agreed to overlook their crookedness by wilfully restricting our activities.
Disclaimer: Dianetics and Scientology are trademarks of the Religious Technology Center (RTC.) These pages and their author are not connected with the Church of Scientology or RTC, or any other organization residing under their corporate umbrella.
This site is best viewed using a highly standards-compliant browser
Disclaimer: This archive is presented strictly in the public interest for research purposes. All the copyrights of materials reproduced here are the properties of their respective owners.
THE Church of Scientology of California was told by Mr. Justice Fisher in the High Court yesterday that it cannot continue libel actions against three newspapers unless it pays their costs incurred in preliminary proceedings which it has now abandoned.
Costs are estimated at more than £500.
Mr. Justice Fisher had earlier been told by Mr. Leon Brittan, counsel for the church, that it was no longer seeking injunctions sought at a previous hearing, restraining further publication of the alleged libels pending the hearing of the full action.
The judge, sitting in the Vacation Court, said that the order for costs would also be against Mrs. Jane Kember, an official of the church, of Sharpthorne, near East Grinstead, in actions where she was concerned.
Referring to the church the Judge said: "They are a foreign corporation and I have no grounds for being satisfied that the defendants could successfully execute for the costs on property of the plaintiffs in this country."
The three newspapers concerned are the Daily Express, Sunday Mirror and News Of The World. They all deny libel.
At the previous hearing, last Thursday, ex-parte applications for injunctions against the three newspapers were refused by Mr. Justice Fisher.
The judge beard yesterday's case in private but opened the court to the Press for his judgment. He said that he had heard it in private because he thought it was "unnecessary" to hear applications for costs in open court.
Outside the court a legal spokesman for all the three newspapers said that they would "strongly resist" the forthcoming libel actions and would plead justification, fair comment and privilege.