All of them, those in power, and those who want the power, would pamper us, if we agreed to overlook their crookedness by wilfully restricting our activities.
Disclaimer: Dianetics and Scientology are trademarks of the Religious Technology Center (RTC.) These pages and their author are not connected with the Church of Scientology or RTC, or any other organization residing under their corporate umbrella.
This site is best viewed using a highly standards-compliant browser
«The battleground is YouTube and Scientology's weapon is a clip of me losing it in the "Mind Control" section of a gruesome exhibition.»
You can to watch the show online from Panorama's web site or see it at Mark Bunker's blog (better quality.) You can read the transcript, you can also give feedback to the Panorama team if you wish.
Despite John Sweeney's outburst (see it
on
YouTube), to which he apologized shortly thereafter
(something the scientologists won't show in
their snippet of video), will the scientologists
address the issues raised in the documentary? Unlikely,
as the founder of Scientology,
L. Ron Hubbard wrote
clear policies on how to deal with criticism: "... always
attack ... don't ever defend ..."
"If there will be a long-term threat, you are to immediately
evaluate and originate a black PR campaign to destroy
the person's repute and to discredit them so thoroughly
that they will be ostracized."
— L. Ron Hubbard, 30 May 1974, "Confidential - PR Series 24 - Handling Hostile Contacts/Dead Agenting" Therefore, expect scientologists to cling to this little video excerpt as a mean to dismiss everything else in the documentary. This is unfortunate, because there are real issues that need to be addressed, so many hurtful and noxious Scientology doctrines, practices and policies, and unfortunately, Scientology has no built-in tools to fix itself. This documentary will give a voice to the ones whose experiences were negative with regard to Scientology. And as usual, the Church of Scientology will certainly show that it wants to be the only voice heard when it comes to express a view on Scientology. Incidentally, journalist David Cohen in his article titled "Tom's aliens target City's 'planetary rulers'" (Evening Standard), on Oct. 23, 2006, reported that Church of Scientology leader David Miscavige gave a speech in which depictions of psychiatrists being machine-gunned were shown, while the Scientologists attending the event applauded wildly... This is essentially the promotion of deadly violence against other human beings just because they happen to practice psychiatry... So understand that Sweeney was surrounded by pure, creepy, scary dogma while inside that exhibition. For further coverage on John Sweeney and "Scientology and me", be sure to visit:
Also, did you know that Panorama also covered Scientology in 1987? See The Road to Total Freedom at Mark Bunker's Xenu TV (part of a larger archive of documentaries on Scientology.) May 15 updateAs expected, the Church of Scientology put up a web site attempting to discredit John Sweeney and the Panorama team. Even though Panorama is not above criticism, it is important to know that 'dead agenting' is Church of Scientology's policy, as devised by its founder L. Ron Hubbard. As usual, the purpose is to avoid addressing real issues raised concerning many Scientology practices. In a Scientology world, opposing views would be made illegal:
"Somebody some day will say 'this is
illegal.' By then be sure the orgs [Scientology
organizations] say what is legal or not."
— L. Ron Hubbard, 4 January 1966, "LRH Relationship to Orgs" May 19 updateAn anonymous poster reported an email supposedly circulated inside the Scientology organization in Australia. Here is the subject title of the reported email (my emphasis): Subject : PLEASE SEE - WE NEED YOUR HELP NOW TO
DEAD AGENT WHAT AIRED TONIGHT
What "aired tonight" was BBC Panorama's "Scientology and me" on Australia's Channel 7's "Today Tonight" show. This is interesting, if real: an explicit request to use Scientology's 'dead agent' doctrine as a defense. Sure, the scientologists wouldn't think to fix what is wrong with their 'religion' in the first place, they rather 'fix' the people reporting on what is wrong with their 'religion'... |
The Daily Mail (May 19, 2007): "'Tom Cruise's Church of hate
tried to destroy me'"
[...]
Almost daily threatening letters arrived by fax and post
at the newspaper where I used to work. Messages were
left on the answer machine at the home of the managing
director.
The Sun (May 18, 2007): "Sorry for shouting you weirdos"Strangers turned up in his village asking questions about him. And the culprits behind this campaign of intimidation? Step forward the Church of Scientology. This week the Mail exposed disturbing apparent links between the "church" and the City of London Police. Our report was followed by a Panorama programme in which reporter John Sweeney was seen losing his temper with a scientologist, claiming afterwards that he had been driven over the edge by a concerted campaign of harassment by the group. [...]
I was wrong to lose it, I apologised then and I
apologise now.
The Guardian (May 15, 2007): "Scientologists may take legal
action in Panorama row"But Scientology is something else. They’ve also put out an attack magazine in which they say: “John Sweeney outdid Hitler at his Nuremberg Rally speech.” I’m a disgrace, a bigot, the BBC has dumbed down. And their DVD says Panorama faked a demonstration which triggered terrorist threats against the Church — implying that we might be in league with terrorists. That’s what happens when you start ask questions about Scientology. They come for you, big time. [...]
The
Church of Scientology last night launched a fresh
attempt to discredit the Panorama reporter John Sweeney,
following the broadcast of a prime time BBC1 programme
investigating its controversial beliefs and recruiting
methods.
Evening Standard (May 15, 2007): "This rich creepy
cult has friends in high places" by Francis WheenAs Panorama editor Sandy Smith took to the airwaves to defend Sweeney's investigation following the furore around his furious YouTube outburst captured by Scientology cameras, the war of words and online propaganda intensified. Mike Rinder, a director at Church of Scientology International, said it was considering legal action and a formal complaint to the media regulator Ofcom. [...]
JOHN
Travolta is a halfwit. A statement of the obvious,
perhaps, given his adherence to a cult which believes
we’re all infected with the souls of aliens who were
banished to earth 75 million years ago by an evil
galactic warlord called Xenu. But if anyone doubted it,
the former disco-strutter confirmed his asininity by
publicly urging the BBC not to screen John Sweeney’s
Panorama film about Scientology last night. Not to be
outdone, Travolta’s fellow-cultists gleefully posted on
YouTube a clip of Sweeney losing his temper.
CNN (May 14, 2007): Scientology and Me AftermathHad they paused for a moment’s rational thought — tricky, I agree, with extraterrestrial imps running amok in your brain — they’d have realised their actions could only boost the audience for Panorama. Is this what they wanted? I doubt it. Scientologists loathe journalistic scrutiny, and with good reason. For decades they were visible merely as pod-people who lurked in the Tottenham Court Road, inviting passers-by to come in and take a “personality test” — as familiar and absurd as their near-neighbour Stanley Green, the sandwich-board man of Oxford Street who warned that protein was the root of all evil. Recently, however, these extraterrestrial creeps have been using their vast wealth to buy respectability; and until Sweeney got on their case they were doing rather well. At the opening of their huge new headquarters in the City of London last October, Chief Superintendent Kevin Hurley praised Scientologists as “a force for good — raising the spiritual wealth of society”. It then emerged that at least 20 of his fellow officers in the City force had accepted hospitality from the Church of Scientology in the previous year, including invitations to the premiere of Mission: Impossible 3 and tickets to a £500-ahead dinner attended by Tom Cruise. [...]
We set out to ask if Scientology was changing. It's an
organisation with a chequered history, and a very
colourful founder. It's been described as corrupt and
sinister in courts in the UK. But the Church says that's
all in the past, and it's just opened a new HQ in
London.
Evening Standard (May 14, 2007): "Scientology to
‘expose’ BBC tactics" by Alexa BaracaiaAs part of his investigations, our reporter John Sweeney (more from him here) had been shown an exhibition entitled the 'Industry of Death'. Scientologists believe that all psychiatry should be eradicated, and that it is evil in every form. Like everything to do with Scientology, their views are absolute. [...]
THE
Church of Scientology is launching a website and
magazine in its campaign against the BBC, aimed at
“exposing” its “rogue” documentary tactics.
BBC News (May 14, 2007): News item on the BBC Panorama
"Scientology & Me"It comes amid a growing row over a Panorama investigation into the religious sect, which is due to be screened tonight. During filming, reporter John Sweeney lost his temper and shouted at Scientology representative Tommy Davis. Footage of the scene — which Scientologists say is proof of bias — was posted on internet site YouTube. Scientologists have also spent a reported £30,000 sending 100,000 copies of a DVD of the incident to MPs, media groups, religious leaders and heads of business. Mr Sweeney claims he and some of his film team were “spied upon” by Scientologists. Now Scientology chiefs are to go live with an anti-BBC website, www.bbcpanorama-exposed.net, where visitors can order a magazine containing alleged criticisms of the BBC. Mike Rinder, a director of Scientology International, told the Standard that the claims of spying were “an absolute and utter lie” and indicated the church may consider legal action. Panorama editor Sandy Smith today defended Mr Sweeney and vowed the documentary would be broadcast. |
The Daily Mail (May 14, 2007): "BBC man says 'I was wrong to
lose it. But these scientologists are truly scary'"
BBC
reporter John Sweeney apologises for losing his temper on
tonight's Panorama programme on Scientology.
The Daily Telegraph (May 14, 2007): "Screaming rage of the man
from Panorama"He talks about the 6 months of intensive research behind the film and what it was exactly that drove him to lose it This was a disaster. I feel ashamed and, although I've been kicked around the Panorama office by the BBC, no one is more embarrassed about me losing it than me. I let my team down and I apologised when it happened and I apologise again now. However, to understand how I felt, you've got to spend six months investigating the Church of Scientology, then a whole week of continued contact with both its followers and its ex-followers, then spend 90 minutes inside an exhibition on mind control and then try to behave normally. I felt as though I was losing my mind to them. [...]
A
bitter row has erupted between the BBC and the Church of
Scientology after an experienced reporter lost his temper
on camera and screamed at a senior member of the controversial
group for 30 seconds.
BBC One Panorama (May 13, 2007): "Scientology and Me"The corporation has been forced to defend itself against claims in a Scientology DVD that it orchestrated a demonstration against the group, whose adherents include Hollywood actors John Travolta, Tom Cruise and Anne Archer, in which a "terrorist death threat" was allegedly made. John Sweeney, a journalist for Panorama, has also had to apologise for his outburst after he was filmed shouting furiously at Tommy Davis, a Scientologist. [...]
The battleground is YouTube and Scientology's weapon
is a clip of me losing it in the "Mind Control" section
of a gruesome exhibition.
The Sunday Telegraph (May 13, 2007): "BBC denies 'death threat'
in Scientology row"Scientology has fought many battles to keep its secrets off the web, now they are using it to attack my investigation into them. Scientology has prepared an attack video, and they have shown the Scientology v Sweeney shouting match to anyone who would watch it. There is talk of 100,000 copies being released. [...]
The BBC has hit back at accusations that it orchestrated
a demonstration against Scientologists during which a "terrorist
death threat" was allegedly made.
The Observer (May 13, 2007): "Losing it: BBC reporter's rant
is caught on video"It comes as a bitter row develops between the Corporation and Scientologists over a highly critical Panorama documentary about the religion, in which a veteran reporter lost his temper and screamed for 30 seconds at a Church member. The BBC has seriously reprimanded John Sweeney for the outburst, which the journalist has admitted was "wrong and stupid". The church posted the clip of Mr Sweeney's rant on the self-broadcasting website YouTube, and has now distributed 100,000 copies of a DVD it made of the BBC crew filming the documentary. It released the DVD to MPs, peers and religious leaders in an offensive to counter allegations made against Scientologists in the Panorama film. The BBC documentary will be aired on BBC1 tomorrow. [...]
A
Journalist at Panorama, the BBC's flagship current affairs
series, has been reprimanded for losing his temper and screaming
with rage during the making of an investigation into the
Church of Scientology.
Daily Mail (May 13, 2007): "Travolta's attack on BBC man in
Scientology expose"John Sweeney has apologised for the outburst against a scientologist which was filmed and then put on the video-sharing website YouTube, prompting criticism of the corporation. The BBC held an internal inquiry but said Sweeney had not breached any guidelines. The incident is one of the first examples of 'video ambushing', where organisations being investigated turn the camera on the film makers. The Church of Scientology, whose members include the Hollywood stars Tom Cruise and John Travolta, shadowed the Panorama team in America with its own camera crew. It has made a 'counter documentary', attacking Sweeney's methods, and distributed 100,000 DVDs to MPs, civil servants, religious groups, media organisations and business leaders. [...]
John
Travolta has launched a bitter attack on a veteran BBC reporter
over a Panorama film that exposes the methods used by Scientology
and questions whether it is a "brainwashing cult".
The Sunday Times (May 13, 2007): "Scientologists to BBC: what
planet are you on?"The Hollywood star has written to Corporation chiefs accusing journalist John Sweeney of venting "personal prejudices, bigotry and animosity" and harbouring "hatred against my religion". [...]
THE Church of Scientology is trying to counter a BBC exposé
by turning the cameras on the Panorama investigators and
distributing 100,000 DVDs of its “findings”.
BBC
News (May 12, 2007): "Row over Scientology video"In a preemptive strike that is costing the church £30,000, it is sending copies of the DVD to all MPs and peers, religious leaders and other “influential” figures. So determined has it been to neuter claims in the programme that it is a cult that its film makers tailed the journalists, employed CCTV and repeatedly confronted reporters. It accuses the BBC of sharp practice and “gross bias” — and has posted footage on YouTube of the programme’s reporter John Sweeney “losing it” by screaming at a Scientology spokesman. [...]
The battleground is YouTube and Scientology's weapon
is a clip of me losing it in the "Mind Control" section
of a gruesome exhibition.
Scientology has fought many battles to keep its secrets off the web, now they are using it to attack my investigation into them. Scientology has prepared an attack video, and they have shown the Scientology v Sweeney shouting match to anyone who would watch it. There is talk of 100,000 copies being released. [...] |